Bance, Anil
-
031843
Decisions
To view a decision against this individual, click
one of the decisions below.
Outcome:
Closure
Outcome date: 1
December
2009
Published date: 10
December
2009
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of
publication
Name: Ascot & Chase
Address(es):
26 Station Approach, Hayes, Bromley, Kent,, BR2 7EH
Firm ID: 369906
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Reasons/basis
The Panel of Adjudicators Sub-Committee was satisfied that:
1. there was reason to suspect dishonesty on the part of Mr Bance and Mr Cheema;
2. Mr Bance and Mr Cheema had failed to comply with the Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998; and
3. it was necessary to exercise the intervention powers to protect the interests of clients (or former clients) of Mr Bance and Mr Cheema.
Help and more information
Outcome:
Prosecution
Outcome date: 1
December
2009
Published date: 10
June
2010
Firm details
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving
rise to outcome
Name: Ascot & Chase Solicitors
Address(es):
26 Station Approach, Hayes, Bromley, Kent BR2 7EH
Firm ID: 369906
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Reasons/basis
This notification relates to a Decision to prosecute before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include that Mr Bance :-
- 1. Withdrew money from Client Account in breach of Rule 22 of the Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998.
- 2. Failed to keep accounting records properly written up at all times.
- 3. Failed to carry out reconciliations of the client accounts
- 4. Failed to act with integrity
- 5. Failed to act in the best interests of his client.
- 6. Failed to fulfil undertakings.
- 7. Acted in circumstances where there existed a conflict between his interests and those of his client.
The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.
Help and more information