Bartlett, Andrew William Arthur
-
112999
Decisions
To view a decision against this individual, click
one of the decisions below.
Outcome: Condition
Outcome date: 21
February
2011
Published date: 18
March
2011
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of publication and
at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Harrison Drury & Co
Address(es):
3 Fleet Street, Preston, Lancashire, PR1
Firm ID: 534326
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Decision details
To grant Mr A W A Bartlett a practising certificate for the practice year 2010/2011 subject to the conditions that
1) he is not a sole practitioner or sole director of a recognised body;
2) he is not a manager or owner of a recognised body where all the other managers or owners, have less than 3 years experience practising as a lawyer in a firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority unless the arrangements have first been approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, are recognised bodies of which he is a sole director;
3) Mr Bartlett shall immediatley inform any actual or propsective employer, co-manager, or co-owner of these conditions and the reasons for their imposition.
Reasons/basis
It remains in the interests of the public to continue the above conditions for the ime being. The condiitons are imposed pursuant to Regulation 6.1(a) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2009.
Help and more information
Outcome: PC/registration free of conditions
Outcome date: 27
April
2012
Published date: 4
July
2012
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of
publication
Name: Harrison Drury & Co Ltd
Address(es):
1a Chapel Street, Winckley Square, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 8BU
Firm ID: 534326
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Decision details
An Authorised Officer DECIDED to grant Mr Andrew Bartlett a practising certificate for the practice year 2011/2012 free from conditions.
Reasons/basis
Mr Bartlett was subject to Regulation 3.1(a)(i), (b), (c), (e), (g), (k)(i) and (m) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011.
After careful consideration to Mr Bartlett's regulatory and disciplinary history, the Authorised Officer was satisfied that it would not be necessary, reasonable or proportionate in the interests of protection of the public to impose any practising certificate condition at this time. The Authorised Officer was also satisfied that none of the purposes specified in Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 make it necessary in the interests of the public to impose any practising certificate condition.
Accordingly, the Authorised Officer authorised the issue of an unconditional practising certificate.
Help and more information