Barratt, Steven Richard
-
123213
Decisions
To view a decision against this individual, click
one of the decisions below.
Outcome:
Condition
Outcome date: 9
December
2010
Published date: 17
January
2011
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of publication and
at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: LHP Law Limited Liability Partnership
Address(es):
37 Gay Street, Bath, Somerset, BA1 2NT
Firm ID: 349074
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Reasons/basis
To grant Mr Steven Richard Barratt a practising certificate for the practice year 2010/2011 subject to the condition that he delivers half yearly accountant’s reports to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, such reports and any cease to hold report required under the rules to be delivered within 2 months of the end of the period to which they relate.
Other information
In light of Mr Barratt continuing to be subject to a Company Voluntary Arrangement in respect of his current firm of LHP Law Limited Liability Partnership, the SRA is satisfied that the above condition will, in the public interest, continue to facilitate closer monitoring by the SRA of his compliance with the Solicitors’ Accounts Rules, pursuant to Regulation 6.1(e) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2009.
Help and more information
Outcome:
PC/registration free of conditions
Outcome date: 4
February
2012
Published date: 9
February
2012
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of
publication
Name: Chebsey Law Limited
Address(es):
14 New Bond Street, Bath SOMERSET BA1 1BE
Firm ID: 546487
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving
rise to outcome
Name: LHP Law LLP
Address(es):
37 Gay Street, Bath BA1 2NT
Firm ID: 349074
Outcome details
This outcome was reached
by SRA decision.
Decision details
The Authorised Officer DECIDED to grant Mr Barratt a practising certificate for the practice year 2011/2012 free from conditions.
Reasons/basis
Mr Barratt was subject to Regulation 3.1(g) and (k)(iv) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011.
The Authorised Officer was satisfied that it would not be necessary, reasonable or proportionate in the interests of protection of the public to impose any practising certificate condition. The Authorised Officer was also satisfied that none of the purposes specified in Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 make it necessary in the interests of the public to impose any practising certificate condition. Accordingly, the Authorised Officer authorised the issue of an unconditional practising certificate.
Help and more information