Loading...

Edada, Emmanuel Udumubra - 168988

Decisions

To view a decision against this individual, click one of the decisions below.

Decision - control of practice

Outcome: Control

Outcome date: 10 February 2010

Published date: 10 March 2010

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication

Name: Emmanuel & Co

Address(es):
274a Kentish Town Road London

Firm ID: 428717

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details

An Authorised Officer DECIDED to grant Emmanuel Edada a practising certificate for the practice year 2009/2010 subject to the condition that within six months of the date of notification of this decision, he undertakes a course, accredited by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, for the purpose of continuing professional development on law firm management and provides confirmation of his attendance (in the form of a certificate or letter of completion from the course provider) when he next applies for a practising certificate.

Reasons/basis

The above condition is imposed in the interests of the public and the profession. The Authorised Officer considered that it will be beneficial to Mr Edada as sole principal of Emmanuel & Co to ensure that his knowledge on effectively managing and supervising the running of a firm is refreshed and updated. This is not a disciplinary sanction, as continuing professional development is a mandatory professional requirement.

Help and more information

Decision - control of practice

Outcome: PC/registration free of conditions

Outcome date: 28 April 2011

Published date: 3 May 2011

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Emmanuel & Co

Address(es):
63-65 Camden High Street, London NW1

Firm ID: 428717

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details

The Authorised Officer decides to grant Emmanuel Edada a practising certificate for the practice year 2010/2011 free from conditions.

Reasons/basis

The Authorised Officer was satisfied that none of the purposes specified in Regulation 6 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2009 make it necessary in the interests of the public to impose any practising certificate condition.  

Help and more information