Loading...

Khattak, Aurang - 321501

Decisions

To view a decision against this individual, click one of the decisions below.

Decision - prosecution

Outcome: Referral to Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

Outcome date: 15 December 2010

Published date: 20 January 2012

Firm details

Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Caffrey & Company Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd

Address(es):
57 Yardley Road, Acocks Green, Birmingham B27 6LL

Firm ID: 222787

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Reasons/basis

This notification relates to a Decision to prosecute before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include:-

1. Breaches of the Solicitors' Accounts Rules 1998.

 2. Failure to exercise appropriate supervision of all staff.

3. Failure to act in the best interest of clients.

 4. Failed to comply with an undertaking.

The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.

Help and more information

Decision - closure

Outcome: Intervention

Outcome date: 25 April 2012

Published date: 6 July 2012

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Caffrey & Co Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd

Address(es):
57 Yardley Road, Acocks Green, Birmingham, B27 6LL

Firm ID: 222787

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details

Decision to intervene into practice. 

Reasons/basis

1.The Committee was satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 1(1) (m) of Part I of Schedule 1 to the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended), as it agreed that it was necessary to exercise the powers conferred by Part II of this Schedule (or any of them) in relation to Mr Aurang Khattak to protect the interests of clients (or former or potential clients) of Mr Aurang Khattak or his firm, or the beneficiaries of any trust which Mr Aurang Khattak is or was a trustee.

2. The Committee was satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 32(1)(e) of Schedule 2 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 (as amended), as it agreed that it was necessary to exercise the powers conferred by Part II of this Schedule (or any of them) in relation to Caffrey & Co Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd to protect the interests of clients (or former or potential clients) of Caffrey & Co Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd or the beneficiaries of any trust which Caffrey & Co Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd or any manager or employee of Caffrey & Co Incorporating Khattak-Pasha & Co Ltd are or were a trustee.  

Help and more information