Loading...

Decision-making criteria

Manager, decision to approve or refuse with or without conditions on a body's authorisation

Last updated: 20 March 2012

This criteria came into effect on 20 March 2012.

Introduction

This criteria relates to decisions made in respect of applications to become an authorised body’s manager.

Delegated authority

This is set out in delegations [d24]  [d25

Criteria in statutory rules

The relevant provisions are:

Criteria

About this criteria

The SRA Authorisation Rules set out criteria to be applied and procedures to be followed for the approval of a manager (i.e. a partner in a partnership, a member of an LLP or director of a company).

This decision making criteria provides a broad summary of the relevant provisions and gives guidance to decision makers on how to apply those provisions. This is not an exhaustive list of the factors which may be relevant in individual cases. Further information about our approach to decision making can be found in the Decision-making framework

Approving a manager

The SRA Authorisation Rules require that all managers of an authorised body need to be approved by the SRA. We will take into account the criteria set out in the SRA Suitability Test and any other relevant information (Rule 15 of the SRA Authorisation Rules).

Who can be a manager?

Criteria in Rule 8.6(d) and (e) of the SRA Authorisation Rules requires that no licensed body or recognised body may, except in accordance with the SRA's written permission, permit an individual to be a manager of the body if:

  •  that person's name has been struck off the roll;  
  •  he/she is suspended from practising as a solicitor;   
  •  his/her practising certificate has been suspended whilst he/she is an undischarged bankrupt;   
  •  there is a direction in force in respect of that person under section 47(2)(g) of the Solicitors Act 1974;   
  •  there is an order in force in respect of that individual under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974.  

Rule 8.6(b) states a person cannot be a manager of a licensed body if they have been disqualified from being a manager. In addition, the criteria set out in Rule 8.6(c) relates to the manager's capacity as employee and stipules that an authorised body must not employ or remunerate a person if they have been disqualified from being an employee.

The deeming provisions in Rule 13.2 of the SRA Authorisation Rules may apply to the manager if:

  •  the candidate is a solicitor who holds a current practising certificate; or an authorised body;  
  •  there is no condition on the candidate’s practising certificate or authorisation as appropriate, preventing or restricting them from being a manager of an authorised body or a sole practitioner;  
  •  the candidate has applied on the prescribed form in advance of becoming a manager, and  
  •  the SRA has not withdrawn its approval of that person to be a manager.  

If the deeming provisions apply the candidate will be deemed to have passed the Suitability Test.

Where the deeming provisions do not apply, Rule 15 of the SRA Authorisation Rules deals with the suitability of the manager and the decision maker must be satisfied as to the suitability of the candidate in accordance with the Suitability Test.

Approval subject to conditions

Rule 14.5 of the SRA Authorisation Rules provides that the decision-maker may, at the time of granting approval or at any time thereafter, make the approval of the manager subject to such conditions on the body’s authorisation as they consider appropriate having regard to the criteria in Rule 9 of the rules.

Providing the SRA with information

Pursuant to Rule 14.2 of the SRA Authorisation Rules all information, documents, and references as specified by the SRA must have been received.

In order to approve a role holder we will need to be satisfied that the relevant tests have been met. The SRA expects the applicant body and the individual candidate to provide sufficient evidence to enable the SRA to properly assess this. If insufficient evidence has been provided by the time that a decision is taken, the authorisation for the relevant role will be refused.

Policy

Principles of regulatory decision-making, approved by the SRA Board, provide a set of standards applicable to decisions. The principles are supported by guidelines. The principles and guidelines are written, accessible to all staff and published on the website. In addition to the principles and guidelines, the decision-maker must also take into account the potential impact of decisions on competition and human rights.

The reasons given by a decision-maker will normally include specific criteria applicable to the decision. SRA Policies relevant to decision-making are reflected in the criteria.

Case study

The example below is illustrative and does not set any type of precedent. Each matter is considered on its own facts and merits.

A company registered in England & Wales offers legal and financial services in London and is currently an authorised body.

They wish to employ a new manager and make an application for approval of the same.

The proposed new manager is a solicitor with a current practising certificate, however the solicitor has a condition of approved employment. This condition prevents the new manager from being deemed approved under the deemed approval process contained within Rule 13.2 of the SRA Authorisation Rules.

The proposed new manager must undergo the approval process, and the SRA will take into account the criteria set out in the SRA Suitability Test and the candidate submits a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) disclosure.

The proposed new manager undergoes the Suitability Test. Suitability Assessment includes comprehensive vetting procedures, the outcome of which shows an outstanding IVA.

The candidate provides documentary evidence that the individual entered into an IVA as he was going through an acrimonious divorce at the time. The evidence provided showed that he was trying to maintain two homes, the former matrimonial home for his former wife and children and another for himself. Since entering the IVA, the candidate has settled the financial aspects of his divorce and has been paying off his debts in accordance with the IVA for over three years.

A review of the business practices of the authorised body is undertaken. A risk assessment is undertaken, which includes consideration of the business plans and structures, which satisfies the SRA of proper control. The plans include clear governance arrangements.

The application is approved with the condition on the applicant body that the new manager must not be a signatory to the client account.