Guidance on the impact on exempt European lawyers of the Governments Statutory Instrument on the basis of a no deal EU exit scenario
Guidance note on the impact on exempt European lawyers of the Government’s Statutory Instrument on the basis of a ‘no deal’ EU exit scenario
Issued on 10 December 2018
This Guidance does not form part of the SRA Handbook. It is intended to explain some of the implications of a ‘no-deal’ EU exit on exempt European lawyers and firms they are involved in, should this happen.
Who is this guidance for?
Exempt European lawyers (EELs), law firms and other interested parties.
Purpose of this guidance
In response to the Technical Notice published by the government and the laying of a draft statutory instrument (SI) this guidance sets out the potential impact on EELs and law firms of a ‘no deal’ EU exit and future options. published by the government, this guidance sets out the potential impact on RELs and law firms of a ‘no deal’ EU exit and future options.
This guidance is not intended to provide definitive answers on the impact of EU exit on legal services, as this will depend on the outcome of the negotiations between the UK government and the EU.
On 12 October 2018 the Government published a Technical Notice setting out its approach regarding the impact of a ‘no deal’ EU exit scenario on EU lawyers practising in the UK. On 21 November 2018 the Government laid the draft Statutory Instrument, The Services of Lawyers and Lawyer’s Practice (Revocation etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, before Parliament.
The Government has stressed that the publication of the Notice does not mean that a ‘no deal’ scenario is the most likely. They are taking steps to prepare for all potential outcomes, including preparing for a no deal scenario.
We will continue to work cooperatively with the Government and interested parties to make sure that whatever the outcome of the negotiations, any changes are implemented as effectively and smoothly as possible both for the profession and the people who use the services of European lawyers.
This note is published in response to the Technical Notice and the draft SI to explain the impact of the changes to EELs in the event of a no deal EU Exit.
The current position
Our existing arrangements allow for a special category of European lawyers to be managers or owners of law firms we regulate: exempt European lawyers (EELs).
EELs are principally EEA/EU lawyers based entirely in offices outside of England and Wales.
We have created EELs to reflect statutory provisions which allow certain EEA/EU lawyers to be managers and owners of recognised bodies without being authorised persons.
Impact of a ‘no deal’ EU exit on EELs.
In the event of a no deal exit, the draft SI deletes these statutory provisions1 from the end of the transitional period – 31 December 2020. This means that from that date, EELs can no longer be owners or managers of recognised bodies unless they are Scottish or Northern Irish lawyers. They will become unauthorised persons which will make the law firm in which they work a licensable body, that is an Alternative Business Structure.
There are presently about 1900 EELs in this situation who mostly work in City and International law firms we regulate. We want to make the transition from our current arrangements as smooth as possible in the event of a no deal exit from the EU. This guidance sets out answers to some common FAQs that EELs may have.
Questions and answers
We define EELs (in the SRA Glossary) as More
‘a member of an Establishment Directive profession:
- registered with the BSB; or
- based entirely at an office or offices outside England and Wales, who is not a lawyer of England and Wales (whether entitled to practise as such or not).’
EELs may be managers or owners of recognised bodies, if approved as such by the SRA in accordance with rule 8.6 of the SRA Authorisation Rules 2011, because of provisions in the Legal Services Act 2007 and the Administration of Justice Act 1985.
not after the end of the transitional period unless you are a UK qualified lawyer.2 The statutory provisions which allow EELs to be managers and owners of recognised bodies will be repealed at the end of the transitional period - that is on 31 December 2020. This will mean that EELs will no longer be able to be managers or owners of a recognised body from that date. If they remain as managers, the firm will become a licensable body - that is it will have to become an ABS.
However, Registered Foreign lawyers (RFLs) can be managers or owners of recognised bodies (subject to SRA approval). Therefore, if you are an EEL and become an RFL, you will be able to continue to be a manager or owner of a recognised body after 31 December
Unless you are UK qualified lawyer, if you are an owner or manager of a recognised body and wish to continue to be after 31 December 2020, you will need to become an RFL. More
In the event of a ‘no deal’ exit from the EU, we are planning to automatically passport all EELs who are owners or managers of recognised bodies authorised by us to become RFLs at the end of the transitional period unless they notify us that they do not wish to become an RFL. This should minimise the regulatory burden on EELs and help make the transition as smooth as possible. There will be no fee for this process.
We will work out the detail around this once we know that we will be leaving the EU without a deal, but as a minimum we will contact all EELs through their authorised body to notify them of our proposed course of action. We will also make clear the regulatory impact that becoming an RFL will have on them – but see below for a brief summary of the position.
An RFL has limited additional practising rights and is subject to the same rules of conduct as solicitors. We can take disciplinary proceedings against RFLs. More
RFLs must renew their registration on 31 October each year and pay the prescribed fee.
If you are an EEL owner or manager of a recognised body and you do not want to become an RFL, by the end of the transitional period (unless you are an UK qualified lawyer), you will have to cease being an owner or manager. More
Alternatively, the firm in which you are an owner or manager will need to apply to change its authorisation from a recognised body to a licensed body. We will set up a process whereby we will ask you to notify us of the position so that we can contact you nearer the end of the transitional period to explain in detail the process you will need to follow.
You will need to make sure that all EELs either confirm that they will become RFLs or cease to act as owners or managers by the end of the transitional period. More
Alternatively, your firm will need to apply to become a licensed body prior to then. Section 18(3) LSA will apply with the effect that your authorisation will continue after the end of that period for 90 days if your firm is a recognised body that has non-authorised owners or managers.
However, you will be in breach of the SRA Handbook and, in particular, Rule 13.1 the SRA Practice Framework Rules 2011 as your firm will no longer satisfy the eligibility requirements to be a recognised body. Therefore, it is important that you take steps to comply before the end of the transitional period.
The following EU/EEA countries do not currently appear on the SRA’s approved professions list for RFLs. More
Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Lichtenstein and Iceland. We are proposing to add those jurisdictions to that list now so that all EU/EEA lawyers who are registered as RELs or are EELs can become RFLs in due course.
Yes - there is nothing in the SI that seems to prevent this. More
EU lawyers can therefore continue to apply to us for EEL status after exit day. This will enable them to become owners or managers of English and Welsh law firms as now. They should be aware, however, that under our present proposals, they will be passported to RFL status before the end of after the transitional period - i.e. 31 December 2020. There is further information and advice containing the application to become an EEL.
If you require any further assistance, please contact the Professional Ethics helpline.
- For the detail, see the changes proposed by paragraphs 8(2) and (4) and 13(2) and (4) of the Schedule to the SI
- For the purposes of this guidance this means an advocate or solicitor in Scotland or a member of the Bar of Northern Ireland or a solicitor of the Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland