Gabriel Awosika
SRA-regulated solicitor
Conditions apply
This person is allowed to practise as a solicitor, but 'conditions apply' means we restrict what they can do. You can read these restrictions below, in their regulatory record.
- Authorisation
- Admitted on 15/03/2012. Annual practising certificate from 01/11/2025.
- Type of lawyer
- Solicitor
- Regulator
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- SRA number
- 401729
- Regulatory record
- Show regulatory record
The services this person can provide and the protections for clients depend on where this person works.
DECISION HISTORY
These are the disciplinary and regulatory decisions published under our decision publication policy.
Decision - Control of practice
Outcome: Condition
Outcome date: 1 May 2026
Published date: 16 July 2026
Firm details
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Astute Dynamic Ltd
Address(es): 92 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7TY
Firm ID: 632641
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
Gabriel Awosoila's practising certificate for 2025/2026 is subject to the following conditions:
- Gabriel Awosika is not a manager or owner of any authorised body.
- Subject to condition one above, Gabriel Awosika may act as a solicitor only as an employee and only where that employment has first been approved by us.
- Gabriel Awosika may not act as a compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) or compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) for any authorised body.
- Conditions 1, 2 and 3 above are imposed with the exception of Astute Dynamic Ltd (SRA number 632641).
- Gabriel Awosika may not provide reserved or unreserved legal services on his own account under regulation 10.2 of the SRA Authorisation of Individuals Regulations.
In these conditions the terms are as defined in the SRA Glossary
Reasons/basis
The above conditions are necessary in the public interest. They are reasonable and proportionate having regard to the purposes set out in regulation 7 of the SRA Authorisation of Individuals Regulations, and the regulatory objectives and principles governing regulatory activities as contained in section 28 of the Legal Services Act 2007.
Decision - Prosecution
Outcome: Referral to Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Outcome date: 29 March 2025
Published date: 11 May 2026
Firm details
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Astute Dynamic Ltd
Address(es): 92 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TY
Firm ID: 632641
Firm or organisation at date of publication
Name: Astute Dynamic Ltd (Director/Owner) & K & K Solicitors Limited (Consultant)
Address(es): 92 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TY & 12 Market Place, Hatfield AL10 0LN
Firm ID: 632641 & 636034
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Reasons/basis
This notification relates to a Decision to bring Disciplinary Proceedings before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.; This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include that:
- On or around 3 January 2020, he signed and served on the Court a witness statement containing information, which he knew or ought to have known was misleading in that he stated that he had served proceedings on the Defendant in Client A and B's matter on 20 June 2019, when he had not done so.
- On or around 3 January 2020, annexed to his second witness, a letter purportedly dated 20 June 2019 addressed to the Defendant in Client A and B's matter, which he knew or ought to have known was not created on that date when that letter had been created after 24 June 2019 and backdated.
- On or around 12 January 2020, signed and served on the Court a witness statement containing information which he knew or ought to have known was misleading in that he stated that he had served proceedings on the Defendant in Client A and B's matter on 20 June 2019, when he had not done so.
- On 18 June 2020, while giving oral evidence in relation to a strike-out application in Client A and B's matter, gave information to the Court, which he knew or ought to have known was misleading in that he relied on the letter purportedly dated 20 June 2019 annexed to his second witness statement and/or maintained that he had served proceedings on the Defendant on 20 June 2019.
The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.