Nicholas Nikola
Stojanovic
Solicitor
279896
Decision - Control of practice
Outcome: Condition
Outcome date: 30 March 2026
Published date: 30 April 2026
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Ramsdens Solicitors LLP
Address(es): Oakley House, 1 Hungerford Road EDGERTON, HUDDERSFIELD, HD3 3AL, England
Firm ID: 440420
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
Nicholas Stojanovic practising certificate for 2025 / 2026 is subject to the following conditions:
- Mr Stojanovic shall not act as a manager or owner of an authorised body.
- Subject to condition 1, Mr Stojanovic may act as a solicitor, only as an employee where the role has first been approved by us. In these conditions the terms are as defined in the SRA Glossary.
Reasons/basis
The SRA is satisfied that none of the purposes set out in regulation 7 of the SRA Authorisation of Individuals Regulations, or the regulatory objectives contained in the Legal Services Act 2007 and the principles governing regulatory activities in section 28 of that Act, make it necessary in the interests of the public to impose any practising certificate conditions.
Decision - Prosecution
Outcome: Referral to Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Outcome date: 27 October 2025
Published date: 27 April 2026
Firm details
Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Ramsdens Solicitors LLP
Address(es): Oakley House, 1 Hungerford Road, Edgerton, Huddersfield HD3 3AL
Firm ID: 440420
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Reasons/basis
This notification relates to a Decision to bring Disciplinary Proceedings before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include that:-
Mr Stojanovic gave untrue and/or misleading information to his client on three separate occasions by telling them or implying that he was awaiting a medical report in the client's case, when he had already received it.
The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.